Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:44:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:44:23 -0500 Received: from ip68-105-128-224.tc.ph.cox.net ([68.105.128.224]:12712 "EHLO Bill-The-Cat.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:44:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:50:34 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: post-halloween 0.2 Message-ID: <20021030195034.GA27472@opus.bloom.county> References: <20021030171149.GA15007@suse.de> <1036006381.5297.108.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <765420000.1036005439@flay> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <765420000.1036005439@flay> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 774 Lines: 19 On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:17:20AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > Can you also mention not using gcc 3.0.x (stack pointer handling bug) > > Any chance of putting this sort of thing as #error detection > in the compile so it auto-breaks? I seem to recall that's done > for some versions of GCC already ... And what arch is that for? Adding a nice facility for per-arch (and maybe global) compiler / binutils testing would be nice, if we're going to go down that road.. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/