Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:09:07 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf probe: Build error with missing libraries
Message-ID: <20140114130907.GA29798@ghostprotocols.net>
References: <20140113180400.GD5318@ghostprotocols.net>
 <20140113181458.GE5318@ghostprotocols.net>
 <52D495D1.5080505@hitachi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52D495D1.5080505@hitachi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

Em Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:41:37AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> (2014/01/14 3:14), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Jiri, this is something else for the give-me-more-ponies list for
> > tests/make: build it on freshly provisioned systems with multiple mixes
> > of devel packages installed ;-)
 
> I think we can change makefile to get some combinations of config options
> when building perf tools.

This is what:

 make -C tools/perf -f tests/make

does, and we use it already, many config combos are tested, but that
kinda expects that all optional devel libs be installed.

What I'm talking about is to, in addition, install the devel packages
iteratively, testing those config options combos with and without
installed devel packages combos.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/