Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752238AbaAOBNn (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:13:43 -0500 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:48763 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751274AbaAOBNm (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:13:42 -0500 X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v2.0.1 X-SHieldMailCheckerPolicyVersion: FJ-ISEC-20120718-3 Message-ID: <52D5E08E.4030309@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:12:46 +0900 From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Zimmer CC: Andrew Morton , Tang Chen , Wen Congyang , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Hedi , Mike Travis , , Subject: Re: [RFC] hotplug, memory: move register_memory_resource out of the lock_memory_hotplug References: <1389723874-32372-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <1389723874-32372-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SecurityPolicyCheck-GC: OK by FENCE-Mail Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (2014/01/15 3:24), Nathan Zimmer wrote: > We don't need to do register_memory_resource() since it has its own lock and > doesn't make any callbacks. > > Also register_memory_resource return NULL on failure so we don't have anything > to cleanup at this point. > > > The reason for this rfc is I was doing some experiments with hotplugging of > memory on some of our larger systems. While it seems to work, it can be quite > slow. With some preliminary digging I found that lock_memory_hotplug is > clearly ripe for breakup. > > It could be broken up per nid or something but it also covers the > online_page_callback. The online_page_callback shouldn't be very hard to break > out. > > Also there is the issue of various structures(wmarks come to mind) that are > only updated under the lock_memory_hotplug that would need to be dealt with. > > > cc: Andrew Morton > cc: Tang Chen > cc: Wen Congyang > cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki > cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu > cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > cc: Hedi > cc: Mike Travis > cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > --- The patch seems good to me. Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu Thanks, Yasuaki Ishimatsu > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > index 1ad92b4..62a0cd1 100644 > --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c > +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > @@ -1097,17 +1097,18 @@ int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) > struct resource *res; > int ret; > > - lock_memory_hotplug(); > - > res = register_memory_resource(start, size); > ret = -EEXIST; > if (!res) > - goto out; > + return ret; > > { /* Stupid hack to suppress address-never-null warning */ > void *p = NODE_DATA(nid); > new_pgdat = !p; > } > + > + lock_memory_hotplug(); > + > new_node = !node_online(nid); > if (new_node) { > pgdat = hotadd_new_pgdat(nid, start); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/