Message-ID: <1389760669.4971.31.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/14] mm, hugetlb: retry if failed to allocate and
 there is concurrent user
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
        David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
        Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>, aswin@hp.com
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:37:49 -0800
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401141906350.451@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
References: <1387349640-8071-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
	 <1387349640-8071-14-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
	 <20131219170202.0df2d82a2adefa3ab616bdaa@linux-foundation.org>
	 <20131220140153.GC11295@suse.de>
	 <1387608497.3119.17.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	 <20131223004438.GA19388@lge.com> <20131223021118.GA2487@lge.com>
	 <1388778945.2956.20.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	 <20140106001938.GB696@lge.com>
	 <1389010745.14953.5.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	 <20140107015701.GB26726@lge.com>
	 <1389062214.9937.0.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401141906350.451@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 19:08 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> 
> > > If Andrew agree, It would be great to merge 1-7 patches into mainline
> > > before your mutex approach. There are some of clean-up patches and, IMO,
> > > it makes the code more readable and maintainable, so it is worth to merge
> > > separately.
> > 
> > Fine by me.
> > 
> 
> It appears like patches 1-7 are still missing from linux-next, would you 
> mind posting them in a series with your approach?

I haven't looked much into patches 4-7, but at least the first three are
ok. I was waiting for Andrew to take all seven for linux-next and then
I'd rebase my approach on top. Anyway, unless Andrew has any
preferences, if by later this week they're not picked up, I'll resend
everything.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/