Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:53:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:53:05 -0500 Received: from zok.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.101]:2978 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:52:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:59:06 -0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: Matthew Dobson Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [patch] pcibus_to_node() addition to topology infrastructure Message-ID: <20021031005906.GA1365@sgi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Dobson , linux-kernel References: <3DC06E75.6010003@us.ibm.com> <20021031000326.GA3049@sgi.com> <3DC0782D.20401@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DC0782D.20401@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 622 Lines: 18 On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:24:13PM -0800, Matthew Dobson wrote: > Ah, yes... The p-bricks, i-bricks, etc. right? Yup. > Yes, I suppose a round-robin return for the SGI version of the macro > would work... Certainly not ideal, but it would work. The problem is Can you think of any better way to do it? Perhaps make pcibus_to_node return a list of nodes? Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/