Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:00:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:00:49 -0500 Received: from 3-090.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.161.90]:59850 "EHLO 3-090.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:00:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:06:54 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Linus Torvalds cc: Rusty Russell , Subject: Re: What's left over. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1031 Lines: 28 On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > > ext2/ext3 ACLs and Extended Attributes > > I don't know why people still want ACL's. There were noises about them for > samba, but I'v enot heard anything since. Are vendors using this? Yes, people use it. Not quite sure why though, I guess ACLs buy some flexibility over the user/group/other model but if the "unlimited groups" patch goes in (is in?) I'm happy ;) Personally I do think either the unlimited groups patch or ACLs are needed in order to sanely run a large anoncvs setup. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/