From: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
To: "gsi@denx.de" <gsi@denx.de>
CC: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kishon@ti.com" <kishon@ti.com>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/dt: Add support for overriding phy configuration
 from device tree
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] net/dt: Add support for overriding phy configuration
 from device tree
Thread-Index: AQHPEjo8iPjq+YyTXECb5rF9nP7rnpqHYceAgAALcoA=
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:40:04 +0000
Message-ID: <1389883203.3720.7.camel@x230>
References: <1389821938-3126-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
	 <20140116135905.GV20094@book.gsilab.sittig.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140116135905.GV20094@book.gsilab.sittig.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A1D6848520A6B54591A734AE58731706@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:59 +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:

> These properties are booleans, and optional?  Does it mean that
> you cannot _disable_ broken features?  Or does it mean that you
> _must_ specify the non-broken features and thus break backwards
> compatibility?  Or are these properties not boolean (they are not
> used in the example either, unfortunately), and the binding text
> would need an update for clarity?  What am I missing?

They're not booleans. I'll update the text to make that clear.

-- 
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?