Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 03:17:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 03:17:55 -0500 Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]:36878 "EHLO netcore.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 03:17:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:24:11 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka Savola To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6 In-Reply-To: <20021031.164940.672083668.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1291 Lines: 28 On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote: > In article (at Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:43:40 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola says: > > > Generating and re-generating new temporary addresses seems to be a useless > > work and just new addresses unless they're being used at least by some > > applications. > > set default to 0 (don't use it) for now is ok? Sure, ok for me. (I'm assuming we'll be able to change the default at some point when more knowledge and experience is gained but we're talking about at least a year or two here, I think). (This is why I never perceived privacy addresses as a critical work item at the moment -- e.g. multicast routing might be more interesting.) I don't know how Dave and Alexey feel, of course. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/