Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:38:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:38:35 -0500 Received: from lech.pse.pl ([194.92.3.7]:1499 "EHLO lech.pse.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:38:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:44:51 +0100 From: Lech Szychowski To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's left over. Message-ID: <20021031094451.GA23213@lech.pse.pl> Reply-To: Lech Szychowski Mail-Followup-To: Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne S.A. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 802 Lines: 20 > Yes, people use it. Not quite sure why though, I guess ACLs > buy some flexibility over the user/group/other model but if > the "unlimited groups" patch goes in (is in?) I'm happy ;) Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe a process has to be restarted to have its group membership list changed? That's a huge difference from ACL behavior which allow for changes to file access rights without the need to restart the accessing process. -- Leszek. -- lech7@pse.pl 2:480/33.7 -- REAL programmers use INTEGERS -- -- speaking just for myself... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/