Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 05:09:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 05:09:26 -0500 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:50381 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 05:09:26 -0500 Subject: Re: What's left over. From: "Trever L. Adams" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rusty Russell , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1036059364.2419.1.camel@aurora.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.2.99 (Preview Release) Date: 31 Oct 2002 05:16:04 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 827 Lines: 22 On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 21:31, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > ext2/ext3 ACLs and Extended Attributes > > I don't know why people still want ACL's. There were noises about them for > samba, but I'v enot heard anything since. Are vendors using this? > I am sure I don't count (not being a vendor), but Intermezzo offers support for this (they are waiting on feature freeze to redo it to 2.5 according to an email I have). I want this stuff. Yes, u+g+w is nice, but good ACLs are even better. Please, if this is technically correct in implementation, do put it in. Thank you, Trever - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/