Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752812AbaAQQC7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:02:59 -0500 Received: from g6t0185.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.62]:8068 "EHLO g6t0185.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752783AbaAQQCz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:02:55 -0500 From: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" To: Hannes Reinecke CC: Tomas Henzl , Andrew Morton , "James E. J. Bottomley" , LKML , LKML-scsi , "Stephen M. Cameron" Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: hpsa, add all PCI ID's that HP has in svn Thread-Topic: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: hpsa, add all PCI ID's that HP has in svn Thread-Index: AQHPE5bhSo2Q8m9EmU6r3yzisfAyz5qJBvuQgAAEH4CAAACm0A== Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:01:42 +0000 Message-ID: <48275AD710FCA34184C2B6186B4016B32D1A0BF3@G6W2491.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <20140116195112.GA9658@beardog.cce.hp.com> <52D948A5.1070706@redhat.com> <48275AD710FCA34184C2B6186B4016B32D1A0B01@G6W2491.americas.hpqcorp.net> <52D94CBB.5020701@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <52D94CBB.5020701@suse.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [15.193.49.14] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Reinecke [mailto:hare@suse.de] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 9:31 AM > To: Miller, Mike (OS Dev) > Cc: Tomas Henzl; Andrew Morton; James E. J. Bottomley; LKML; LKML-scsi; > Stephen M. Cameron > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: hpsa, add all PCI ID's that HP has in svn > > On 01/17/2014 04:17 PM, Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@redhat.com] > >> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 9:14 AM > >> To: Miller, Mike (OS Dev); Andrew Morton; James E. J. Bottomley > >> Cc: LKML; LKML-scsi; hare@suse.de; Stephen M. Cameron > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: hpsa, add all PCI ID's that HP has in > >> svn > >> > >> On 01/16/2014 08:51 PM, Mike Miller wrote: > >>> From: Mike Miller > >>> > >>> This patch has every ID we have in our svn repository. Some > >>> controllers were cancelled, others added, now the cancelled ones are > >>> back. Apparently the debate rages on about which controllers are > >>> cancelled, which are not, whatever. Please accept this patch. It is > >>> dependent upon the patches I sent yesterday. > >>> This patch made/tested against kernel-3.13.0-rc8 > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Mike Miller > >>> --- > >>> drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > >>> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c index > >>> 348b207..3affec5 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c > >>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id > >> hpsa_pci_device_id[] = { > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF, 0x103C, > >> 0x3354}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF, 0x103C, > >> 0x3355}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF, 0x103C, > >> 0x3356}, > >>> + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > >> 0x1920}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > >> 0x1921}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > >> 0x1922}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > >> 0x1923}, > >>> @@ -108,15 +109,19 @@ static const struct pci_device_id > >> hpsa_pci_device_id[] = { > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > >> 0x1926}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > >> 0x1928}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > >> 0x1929}, > >>> + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > >> 0x192A}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21BD}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21BE}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21BF}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21C0}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21C2}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21C3}, > >>> + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21C4}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21C5}, > >>> + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21C6}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21C7}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21C8}, > >>> + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21C9}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21CA}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21CB}, > >>> {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > >> 0x21CC}, > >>> @@ -149,22 +154,29 @@ static struct board_type products[] = { > >>> {0x3354103C, "Smart Array P420i", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x3355103C, "Smart Array P220i", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x3356103C, "Smart Array P721m", &SA5_access}, > >>> + {0x1920103C, "Smart Array P430i", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x1921103C, "Smart Array P830i", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x1922103C, "Smart Array P430", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x1923103C, "Smart Array P431", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x1924103C, "Smart Array P830", &SA5_access}, > >>> + {0x1925103C, "Smart Array P831", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x1926103C, "Smart Array P731m", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x1928103C, "Smart Array P230i", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x1929103C, "Smart Array P530", &SA5_access}, > >>> + {0x192A103C, "Smart Array P531", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x21BD103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x21BE103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x21BF103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > >>> {0x21C0103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > >>> + {0x21C1103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > >> > >> I think that both tables should be in sync - but there is no 0x21c1 > >> in hpsa_pci_device_id (and the 0x1925), could you clarify that? > >> > >> Thanks, Tomas > > > > Crap. It seems like these menial tasks get the better of me. I'll correct and > resubmit. > > > Hmm. Seeing that hpsa is now well capable of supporting even older > SmartArray controllers, is there really a point in updating the PCI-ID list every > time? > Wouldn't you be better off by just using the catch-all phrase and remove all Umm, if we did that but kept the PCI ID repository updated would lspci still show the marketing names of the individual controllers? What about /proc/scsi/scsi and anywhere else the names are listed? -- mikem > the individual IDs? > > That way you would just have to update _one_ list ... > > Cheers, > > Hannes > -- > Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage > hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg > GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend?rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N?rnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/