Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:27:08 +0100
From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/28] drm/i2c: tda998x: use irq for connection
 status and EDID read
Message-ID: <20140117182708.3758acb1@armhf>
In-Reply-To: <52D2EC5D.2010800@gmail.com>
References: <20140109120412.7697d23c@armhf>
	<20140111181432.GB15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<52D18EE9.5030305@gmail.com>
	<20140112195113.316d0c98@armhf>
	<52D2EC5D.2010800@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:26:21 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 01/12/2014 07:51 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:35:21 +0100
> > Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> At least for the DT part, I'd suggest to not ask for interrupt directly
> >> but use a proper gpios property. The can of course be converted to
> >> priv->int_irq in some tda998x_dt_probe.
> >
> > May you give me more information?
> 
> Sure, see [1].
> 
> [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-May/038822.html

Thanks for the link, but I still don't see the advantage of the gpio
(which value?) over the irq number.

-- 
Ken ar c'hentañ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/