Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753467AbaARDZV (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:25:21 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:55968 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752041AbaARDZR (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:25:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1390015514.5444.46.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree From: Mike Galbraith To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 04:25:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140117171441.GG5785@linutronix.de> References: <20131221193900.GA8427@linutronix.de> <1387681647.5412.25.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1387702631.5412.101.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1387773533.5369.16.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20131224193636.GD19211@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1387940854.5373.8.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20131225075544.GE19211@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1387993057.5346.17.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20140117171441.GG5785@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:WmfpzX3sLdshzZZiBbCwMHbio87rDrIfnsfAtdnKdIc 83R/cSkCR6UQ53tsqNtEOBNidWvI3oOg25Uamjju6v6Iv/EYAo 79Lr9Mj4cdP1jwRlg8LlrM4NQpuSnbBjEFx9LukN6BUWwMVAh6 TH3tDMJhkYKEuoCqdzQYFf0PXs9DHdnljMNGoNSQnmwh/BudIh p8uB8BlhJQLH6WkZsH4RLX1MsLKniD8bhV6B0mbNxS8Ge1WRp9 ZXqjzk9XeB68WrXxYo+0Ji8XEtKDMYO/J+e0n5gwLM50z6/Grl 3N/1wRbIg5hnTGZHv413Hlb1MXwHXGsy9Vz+hyz7cKLqcHcDrk AR6RVArzlFH+rA18o7xyRrR5sS8gZRTAJJTXQ0TsLmDHREZsEQ GMNzJ1o9g+/YQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 18:14 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Mike Galbraith | 2013-12-25 18:37:37 [+0100]: > > >On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 23:55 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 04:07:34AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > >Having sufficiently recovered from turkey overdose to be able to slither > >upstairs (bump bump bump) to check on the box, commenting.. > > > ># timers-do-not-raise-softirq-unconditionally.patch > ># rtmutex-use-a-trylock-for-waiter-lock-in-trylock.patch > > > >..those two out does seem to have stabilized the thing. > > timers-do-not-raise-softirq-unconditionally.patch is on its way out. > > rtmutex-use-a-trylock-for-waiter-lock-in-trylock.patch confues me. > Didn't you report once that your box deadlocks without this patch? Now > your 64way box on the other hand does not work with it? If 'do not raise' is applied, 'use a trylock' won't save you. If 'do not raise' is not applied, _and_ you wisely do not try to turn on very expensive nohz_full, things work fine without 'use a trylock'. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/