Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 06:00:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 06:00:49 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:29966 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 06:00:38 -0500 Subject: Re: System unresponsitive when copying HD/HD To: law@sgi.com (LA Walsh) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 11:01:27 +0000 (GMT) Cc: birtl00@dmi.usherb.ca (Delta), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3A7C64F9.F3192611@sgi.com> from "LA Walsh" at Feb 03, 2001 12:07:21 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If I have vmstat running, I notice blocks trickling out to the disk, 5sec averages > 495,142,151,155,136,257,15,0. Note that the maximum read rate (hdparm -t) of this > disk is in the 12-14M/s range. I'm getting about 1-5% of that on output with the > system's disk subsystem being apparently unable to do anything else. > > This is with IDE hard disk with DMA enabled. > > a) is this expected performance on a large linear write? No > b) should I expect other disk operations to be denied service as long as > the write is 'flushing'? No But try 2.4.1 before worrying too much. That fixed a lot of the block performance problems I was seeing (2.4.1 ruins the VM performance under paging loads but the I/O speed is fixed ;)) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/