Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:26:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Message-ID: <20140120082620.GB30183@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20140116145829.5e4fcab103b1c5c77501ee77@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20140116121955.GQ31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20140117074628.88698f59939c9002b7c12968@canb.auug.org.au>
 <CAJvTdKnoNh2YAvtXraYxTct+8e6e_8Om9cAZGSTpy8UO=t=W4w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJvTdKnoNh2YAvtXraYxTct+8e6e_8Om9cAZGSTpy8UO=t=W4w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:45:43PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> +static void mwait_idle(void)
> +{
> +       mwait_idle_with_hints(0, 0);
> +}
> +
> 
> The reason the patch above will crash Core2 machines is because
> core2 machines don't support mwait_idle_with_hints().
> 
> The calling sequence for old and new MWAIT instructions is different.
> The former must be invoked with interrupts enabled,
> and the later can be invoked with interrupts disabled,
> which is a feature that Linux takes advantage of.

What old and new? They're the same byte sequence: 0x0f 0x01 0xc9

And your 'old' __sti_mwait(0,0) has the exact same arguments as
mwait_idle_with_hints(0,0).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/