Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:20:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:20:11 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:15292 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:19:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:26:13 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Nikita Danilov cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH]: reiser4 [8/8] reiser4 code In-Reply-To: <15809.22155.408140.213679@laputa.namesys.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 953 Lines: 24 On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Nikita Danilov wrote: > > And you want that to be reviewed until tonight? > > > > No. But changes to the core are not very complicated. If Linus "reviews" > and accepts them life of reiser4 would be much simpler. Changes to the core consist (AFAICS) of exporting a bunch of functions with no explanation of the way they are used - with some of them it's really straightforward (and can go in at any point), with some one would expect really detailed explanation and code review (your comments regarding fsync_super() export trigger all sorts of alarms for me). PS: Cc'ing a posting on a public list to a subscribers-only one is generally not a nice thing to do... Cc: trimmed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/