Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753225AbaATLaY (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:30:24 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:65102 "EHLO mail-ob0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750738AbaATLaU (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:30:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20140115171704.GB21574@localhost.localdomain> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:00:20 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [QUERY]: Is using CPU hotplug right for isolating CPUs? From: Viresh Kumar To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lists linaro-kernel , Steven Rostedt , Linaro Networking Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16 January 2014 15:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Just do the math. > > max reload value / timer freq = max time span Thanks. > So: > > 0x7fffffff / 24MHz = 89.478485 sec > > Nothing to do here except to get rid of the requirement to arm the > timer at all. @Frederic: Any inputs on how to get rid of this timer here? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/