Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:34:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:33:03 -0500 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:51859 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:32:49 -0500 From: Cort Dougan Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:38:19 -0700 To: Larry McVoy , bob , Linus Torvalds , karim@opersys.com, Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, okrieg@watson.ibm.com, okrieg@us.ibm.com, frankeh@us.ibm.com, LTT-Dev Subject: Re: Is your idea good? [was: Re: LTT for inclusion into 2.5] Message-ID: <20021031093819.F6625@duath.fsmlabs.com> References: <3DC0A01B.15B8B535@opersys.com> <15809.21188.456354.71271@k42.watson.ibm.com> <20021031081921.D27620@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021031081921.D27620@work.bitmover.com>; from lm@bitmover.com on Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:19:21AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 657 Lines: 14 An excellent engineering practice but extremely difficult to do. This is the holy-grail of software design and I don't think it would work for an extremely loosely connected set of developers. There is no central control of the system (or chain of accountability) and that knocks down the practicality of this plan. It would work extremely well in another project, though. } What does the list think of this? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/