Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:34:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:33:01 -0500 Received: from [216.239.30.242] ([216.239.30.242]:1286 "EHLO wind.enjellic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:32:50 -0500 Message-Id: <200210311639.g9VGd33H024723@wind.enjellic.com> From: greg@wind.enjellic.com (Dr. Greg Wettstein) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:39:03 -0600 In-Reply-To: Linus Torvalds "Re: What's left over." (Oct 30, 6:31pm) Reply-To: greg@enjellic.com X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: Linus Torvalds , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: What's left over. Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2566 Lines: 61 On Oct 30, 6:31pm, Linus Torvalds wrote: } Subject: Re: What's left over. > > ext2/ext3 ACLs and Extended Attributes > > I don't know why people still want ACL's. There were noises about > them for samba, but I'v enot heard anything since. Are vendors using > this? I can offer a perspective from someone who has been struggling to get Linux competitive in real-life enterprise situations. ACL's are an issue for Linux (and Samba) in order for the combination to sustain competitiveness against Novell and NT in the desktop fileservices domain. The harsh reality of life is that file and document sharing is a way of life in the environments where Novell dominates. The appearance of ACL's and desktop support for their management in NT would tend to confirm this. Without the granularity of ACL's it becomes too difficult to establish the types of permission environments needed to support what most administrative and department support personnel (ie, secretaries) seem to desire. The patches also begin implementing a common API framework which multiple filesystems seem to be able to leverage. At least the rumor appears to be that the instrastructure allows common toolsets to be used for both ext2/3, XFS and perhaps other filesystems which want to implement ACL's. Its a compilation option and if set to default minimizes the impact on people who don't need or want the infrastructure. Ted also has his fingers in the project which probably means that it isn't going to get neglected. Just my 2 cents. Best wishes for a productive weekend to everyone. Greg }-- End of excerpt from Linus Torvalds As always, Dr. G.W. Wettstein, Ph.D. Enjellic Systems Development, LLC. 4206 N. 19th Ave. Specializing in information infra-structure Fargo, ND 58102 development. PH: 701-281-4950 WWW: http://www.enjellic.com FAX: 701-281-3949 EMAIL: greg@enjellic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Open source code is not guaranteed nor does it come with a warranty." -- the Alexis de Tocqueville Institute "I guess that's in contrast to proprietary software, which comes with a money-back guarantee, and free on-site repairs if any bugs are found." -- Rary - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/