Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:49:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:49:02 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:40968 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:49:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:54:54 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: "Matt D. Robinson" cc: Rusty Russell , , , Subject: Re: What's left over. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1064 Lines: 29 On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Matt D. Robinson wrote: > > This isn't bloat. If you want, it can be built as a module, and > not as part of your kernel. How can that be bloat? I don't care one _whit_ about the size of the binary. I don't maintain binaries, adn the binary can be gigabytes for all I care. The only thing I care about is source code. So the "build it as a module and it is not bloat" argument is a total nonsense thing as far as I'm concerned. Anyway, new code is always bloat to me, unless I see people using them. Guys, why do you even bother trying to convince me? If you are right, you will be able to convince other people, and that's the whole point of open source. Being "vendor-driven" is _not_ a bad thing. It only means that _I_ am not personally convinced. I'm only one person. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/