Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754310AbaAUJuc (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 04:50:32 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:35773 "EHLO mail-ob0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753997AbaAUJua (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 04:50:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20140120154058.GA9436@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:20:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [QUERY]: Is using CPU hotplug right for isolating CPUs? From: Viresh Kumar To: Lei Wen Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Kevin Hilman , Lists linaro-kernel , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Steven Rostedt , Linaro Networking , Tejun Heo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21 January 2014 07:37, Lei Wen wrote: > What is more, I also did similiar test, and find when I set two such > cpuset group, > like core 0-2 to cpuset1, core 3 to cpuset2, while hotunplug the core3 > afterwise. > I find the cpuset's cpus member becomes NULL even I hotplug the core3 > back again. > So is it a bug? I confirm the same :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/