Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:25:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:25:11 -0500 Received: from adsl-67-114-192-42.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([67.114.192.42]:417 "EHLO mx1.corp.rackable.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:25:11 -0500 Message-ID: <3DC1915E.8070502@rackable.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:23:58 -0800 From: Samuel Flory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert L. Harris" CC: Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: Reiser vs EXT3 References: <20021031141950.GM3420@rdlg.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2002 20:31:37.0301 (UTC) FILETIME=[82C80850:01C2811C] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 822 Lines: 21 Robert L. Harris wrote: > Still working on that replacement mail server and a new rumor has hit >the mix. It follows that reiserfs is much faster than ext3 (made ext3, >not converted from ext2 if it matters) and this is causing some >problems. On a 200Gig filesystem is this truely an issue? > > > Have you tried different ext3 journalling modes? Ordered is pretty slow in many cases. You might want to try writeback instead. The downside is that you might end up losing resently written changes in the event of a crash. Try mounting with "-o data=writeback". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/