Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:14:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:14:22 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:48138 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:14:20 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Xiafs inclusion in 2.5? Date: 31 Oct 2002 14:20:17 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: References: <3DC18308.1040808@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2002 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1196 Lines: 29 Followup to: <3DC18308.1040808@gmx.net> By author: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Hello Linus, > > somewhere back in 2000, you wrote: > > Who still remembers xiafs? We have 33 different filesystems in the kernel > > tree - something that is quite impressive, and something that I don't > > think anybody else has ever tried to support. But we could have had 34.. > > Out of curiosity, would you reaccept xiafs in 2.5, if it was cleaned up and > forward ported to use the new interfaces? > And if you accept it, what's the latest date I could submit it? Technically, > it is a regression, ;-) so the feature freeze date might not apply. > Not to be flippant, but really... what's the point? -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/