Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:07:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:06:39 -0500 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.103]:27080 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:04:59 -0500 Subject: Re: Reiser vs EXT3 From: "David C. Hansen" To: Hans Reiser Cc: David Lang , "Robert L. Harris" , Linux-Kernel In-Reply-To: <3DC1A5D5.8000901@namesys.com> References: <3DC1A5D5.8000901@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 31 Oct 2002 14:10:10 -0800 Message-Id: <1036102211.4272.276.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 975 Lines: 24 On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:51, Hans Reiser wrote: > If you want to talk about 2.6 then you should talk about reiser4 not > reiserfs v3, and reiser4 is 7.6 times the write performance of ext3 for > 30 copies of the linux kernel source code using modern IDE drives and > modern processors on a dual-CPU box, so I don't think any amount of > improved scalability will make ext3 competitive with reiser4 for > performance usages. > > We haven't had anyone test performance using RAID yet for reiser4, that > could be fun. I have a 14-drive hardware RAID array on an 8-proc box. Is that the kind of thing you want testing on? If you want to send me some testing scripts, I'll run them. -- Dave Hansen haveblue@us.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/