Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:41:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:41:00 -0500 Received: from petasus.ch.intel.com ([143.182.124.5]:53135 "EHLO petasus.ch.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:40:59 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" To: "'Linus Torvalds'" Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'lkcd-general@lists.sourceforge.net'" , "'lkcd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'" Subject: RE: What's left over. Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:47:14 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 18 > THAT is what I mean by vendor-driven. If vendors decide they > really want the patches, and I actually start seeing noises on > linux-kernel or getting > requests for it being merged from _users_ rather than developers, then > that means that the vendor is on to something. I am a user and I use it; I'd like it. I am a developer and I use it. I'd love it. Forget my intel.com paying my paycheck. Inaky Perez-Gonzalez -- Not speaking for Intel - opinions are my own [or my fault] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/