Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:11:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:11:20 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:61903 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:11:10 -0500 X-Pass-Through: Kazan State University network Message-ID: <3A7D6BAE.1050700@ksu.ru> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 17:48:14 +0300 From: Art Boulatov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10-pre5-reiserfs-3.6.18-acpi-i2c i686; en-US; 0.6) Gecko/20001205 X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [2.4.1] "DEVFS+RAID" not working Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, as I've posted before in [SoftwareRAID in 2.4.1], I wasn't able to get RAID0 working with devfs enabled and mounted on /dev. The problem had gone after I passed devfs=nomount, and used old device names for configuring/starting raid: /dev/md0 instead of /dev/md/0 /dev/sda1 instead of /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 and so on. Why? Is that the way it is supposed to be with raid? Why can't I just use devfs naming scheme, and mount it on boot? For some reason I wouldn't want those old device files under /dev. Thanks in advance, Art. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/