Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752792AbaAXNq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:46:57 -0500 Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:46721 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752481AbaAXNqz (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:46:55 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f796d000005a13-87-52e26ecef2a1 Message-id: <52E26EBE.8080905@samsung.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:46:38 +0100 From: Tomasz Figa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Mj Embd Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linaro-kernel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Arndale Timer Interrupt Question References: <1437466.9hkS4zH5MN@amdc1032> <52D02693.1040003@samsung.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7rn8h4FGbzv4LPYOGM9q8X7Q8+Y LS7vmsNmMeP8PiaLAz2H2BxYPXbOusvucfvfY2aPvi2rGD0+b5ILYInisklJzcksSy3St0vg ylgz9wVrwWPOivPbDjE3ML5h72Lk5JAQMJH4vm0tI4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBpYwSZ6a+ZYZw PjNKvHs7B6yDV0BLYun6yWAdLAKqEo9232UGsdkE1CQ+NzxiA7FFBSIk/s5bzwhRLyjxY/I9 FhBbREBe4tKXRkaQocwCFxgldq9tA2sWFtCVeP7lGtS2G4wS937/BNvGKRAs8fXqBbAiZgFr iZWTtjFC2PISm9e8ZZ7AKDALyZJZSMpmISlbwMi8ilE0tTS5oDgpPddQrzgxt7g0L10vOT93 EyMkmL/sYFx8zOoQowAHoxIP74zAh0FCrIllxZW5hxglOJiVRHi3BjwKEuJNSaysSi3Kjy8q zUktPsTIxMEp1cCYcKX6YMaat//CZ6qeWbw5/Agn88eEKW8u19emvZ1Uvrzsl0DTymhD2zjX vC+X7I1KmBf9njRbLZdF/NHmJqcSwzvHK5xEr2eZzjZ92nmpJOTyDO6ZgWJ6pzawT7dgfs5g fMhfYtbyRztPTmX8+XP96gv5T45d9D5QmDYpaOZvS/4nobMf8NhtVWIpzkg01GIuKk4EAPmx 0RlEAgAA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23.01.2014 07:10, Mj Embd wrote: > On 1/10/14, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 09.01.2014 13:52, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>> >>> added linux-samsung-soc to cc:, >>> it is a better suited list for this question >>> >>> On Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:30:56 AM Mj Embd wrote: >>>> I am a bit confused on the interrupt number for CNTVIRQ..CNTHPIRQ. Can >>>> you please help here. >>>> >>>> As per the exynos5 public manual >>>> What is the difference between CPU_nCNTHPIRQ[0] and CNTHPIRQ. >> >> I'm not sure if this is really what I think it is, but looking at the >> manual, CPU_nCNTHPIRQ[0] and [1] SPI ports and CNTHPIRQ PPI port seem to >> be the same signals, with the difference that the first two are shared >> interrupts connected through the combiner, while the last one is a >> per-processor interrupt, directly connected to GIC PPI port, allowing >> each CPU to get its own CNTHPIRQ signal ([0] for CPU 0 and [1] for CPU 1). > > So while registering the IRQ which one has to be used Core0:26/33 Core1:26/54 ? Well, it depends on your driver. If it supports per-CPU interrupts then you use CNTHPIRQ PPI port, othwerise nCNTHPIRQ[0] and [1] SPI ports. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/