Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752830AbaAZIjr (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jan 2014 03:39:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f170.google.com ([209.85.215.170]:36840 "EHLO mail-ea0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751348AbaAZIjq (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jan 2014 03:39:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 09:39:42 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Ren Qiaowei Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86, mpx: add prctl commands PR_MPX_INIT, PR_MPX_RELEASE Message-ID: <20140126083942.GB29339@gmail.com> References: <1390727338-20487-1-git-send-email-qiaowei.ren@intel.com> <1390727338-20487-4-git-send-email-qiaowei.ren@intel.com> <20140126082201.GB28831@gmail.com> <52E4C5F2.8070707@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52E4C5F2.8070707@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ren Qiaowei wrote: > On 01/26/2014 04:22 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >* Qiaowei Ren wrote: > > > >>This patch adds the PR_MPX_INIT and PR_MPX_RELEASE prctl() > >>commands on the x86 platform. These commands can be used to > >>init and release MPX related resource. > >> > >>A MMU notifier will be registered during PR_MPX_INIT > >>command execution. So the bound tables can be automatically > >>deallocated when one memory area is unmapped. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren > >>--- > >> arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++ > >> arch/x86/include/asm/mpx.h | 9 ++++ > >> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 16 +++++++ > >> arch/x86/kernel/mpx.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 6 +++ > >> kernel/sys.c | 12 +++++ > >> 6 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > Hm. What is the expected typical frequency of these syscalls for a > > larger application like a web browser? Only once per startup > > typically, or will they be called more frequently? > > It will be only once per startup. In that case it would be more efficient to make this part of the binary execution environment so that exec() sets it up automatically, not a separate prctl() syscall. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/