Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:52:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:52:32 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:65202 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:52:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:21:14 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Matthew Dobson Cc: linux-kernel , William Lee Irwin III , Martin Bligh Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] MAX_NR_NODES vs. MAX_NUMNODES Message-ID: <20021101022114.GA728@krispykreme> References: <3DB8927E.5090909@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DB8927E.5090909@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 590 Lines: 18 Hi Matt, > This patch > 1) Gets rid of the include/asm-xxx/numnodes.h files > 2) Defines MAX_NR_NODES to the appropriate per-arch value in > include/asm-xxx/param.h > 3) changes all remaining occurences MAX_NUMNODES to MAX_NR_NODES > throughout the kernel Looks good for ppc64. Anton (using 20 hours of flights trying to catch up on email) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/