Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S265615AbSKAEtn>; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:49:43 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S265616AbSKAEtn>; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:49:43 -0500
Received: from excalibur.cc.purdue.edu ([128.210.189.22]:15364 "EHLO
	ibm-ps850.purdueriots.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S265615AbSKAEtm>; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:49:42 -0500
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:57:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Patrick Finnegan <pat@purdueriots.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's left over.
In-Reply-To: <apt0td$3vq$1@penguin.transmeta.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210312354560.10880-100000@ibm-ps850.purdueriots.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1085
Lines: 32

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> But no, it wasn't the answer you wanted.  So you refuse to listen.  And
> yes, I get irritated too.  So right now I won't touch LKCD with a
> ten-foot pole, if only because I've been mail-bombed by people who argue
> for it when I have better things to do than to explain myself over and
> over again.

Maybe it's because users are wanting it in the mainline kernel...  Notice
I said 'users' not 'vendors' or 'the code's maintainers'.

> What's so hard to understand about the "vendor-driven" thing, and why do
> people continue to argue about it?

Because I'm not a vendor, and I want it.

Pat
--
Purdue Universtiy ITAP/RCS
Information Technology at Purdue
Research Computing and Storage
http://www-rcd.cc.purdue.edu

http://dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/images/dilbert2040637020924.gif



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/