Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 00:35:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 00:35:17 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:27140 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 00:35:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 21:38:42 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Lee, Jung-Ik" Cc: "'linux-kernel'" Subject: Re: RFC: bare pci configuration access functions ? Message-ID: <20021101053841.GE13031@kroah.com> References: <72B3FD82E303D611BD0100508BB29735046DFF6E@orsmsx102.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <72B3FD82E303D611BD0100508BB29735046DFF6E@orsmsx102.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 751 Lines: 20 On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:52:24PM -0800, Lee, Jung-Ik wrote: > Minor fix to the code. > A patch to a flying patch ;-) Ok, maybe just because I've eaten too much candy tonight, but I do not understand where you are trying to go with this odd pseudo code. What's wrong with the _existing_ pci_config_read() and pci_config_write() function pointers that ia64 and i386 have? Can't you just look into if the other archs can set them to the proper function in their pci init functions too? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/