Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 01:43:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 01:43:19 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:3078 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 01:43:19 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:36:35 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Bill Davidsen cc: "Matt D. Robinson" , Rusty Russell , , , Subject: Re: What's left over. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 996 Lines: 28 On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > If you really believed the stuff you say you'd put it in and promise to > take it out if people didn't find it useful or there were inherent > limitations. This never works. Be honest. Nobody takes out features, they are stuck once they get in. Which is exactly why my job is to say "no", and why there is no "accepted unless proven bad". > It would probably take 10-30% off the time to a stable release. Talk is cheap. I've not seen a _single_ bug-report with a fix that attributed the existing LKCD patches. I might be more impressed if I had. The basic issue is that we don't put patches in in the hope that they will prove themselves later. Your argument is fundamentally flawed. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/