Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 05:27:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 05:27:03 -0500 Received: from msg.vizzavi.pt ([212.18.167.162]:36277 "EHLO msg.vizzavi.pt") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 05:27:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:31:41 +0000 From: "Paulo Andre'" To: fdavis@si.rr.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.45 : Documentation/Changes updates ? Message-Id: <20021031103141.5655479a.fscked@netvisao.pt> In-Reply-To: <3DC1C398.7020904@si.rr.com> References: <3DC1C398.7020904@si.rr.com> Organization: Tool Enterprises X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2002 10:33:03.0756 (UTC) FILETIME=[0F0DB4C0:01C28192] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 20 On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:58:16 -0500 Frank Davis wrote: > Hello all, > As I looked at 2.5.45's Documentation/Changes file, I noticed > that > the gcc version is still at 2.95.3 . Is that changing to 3.2 , along > with the other minimum tool versions? Well, the Changes file clearly states that one should *at least* upgrade to the versions mentioned. I still (happily) build kernels with gcc 2.95.3, so I see no point that the minimum requirement should become gcc-3.2, don't you think? -- Paulo Andre' - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/