Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:26:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:26:11 -0500 Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.61]:60664 "EHLO smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:25:56 -0500 Message-ID: <39FE49D1.27AABA3F@haque.net> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:25:53 -0500 From: "Mohammad A. Haque" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caperry@edolnx.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is IPv4 totally broken in 2.4-test In-Reply-To: <39FE5C09.F1B13725@edolnx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org if [ -f /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn ] then echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn fi or dont compile with ECN support int he kernel. Carl Perry wrote: > > I have test9 running in an original Athlon 500, a PII 300, and a K6-2/400. All > of them are experiencing the same problems with networking. I confimred that > this is not happening to just my, as my buddy in a far away (California) land is > experiencing the same thing. I cannot connect to ubid.com, landsend.com, > etrade.com, travelocity.com, and a slew of others. I'm not sure if this is > because all of those sites are going "Wow! His IP stack conforms to _STANDARDS_ > - it must be fake" or what. However, it's really starting to get on my nerves. > > All of the above boxes are based on SuSE 6.4. Using the latest modutils, > binutils 2.10, and egcs-1.1.2 (Which I think is still compiler gratas) My > buddy's box is a Mandrake 7.1 box. I know he was using gcc-2.95.2 and an old > binutils, but he has changed to egcs-1.1.2 and a newer binutils. He's still > having the same problem. I pretty sure it's not an iptables issue, since I > believe that he has iptables off. I also tried no tables on my K6-2 box with > the same effects. > > Is anyone else experiencing these problems? Does anyone know if certain > firewalls don't like 2.4 with a passion? Even better, does anyone know how to > fix it? > > BTW: I have narrowed this down to a 2.4 problem. If I load 2.2 on any of those > machines on the same ISP it doesn't work. > > Any ideas? > -- > -Carl Perry > caperry@edolnx.net > > "Real programmers don't draw flowcharts. Flowcharts are, after > all, the illiterate's form of documentation. Cavemen drew > flowcharts; look how much good it did them." > -Fortune (The App, not the Magazine) > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- ===================================================================== Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/ mhaque@haque.net "Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/ batmanppc@themes.org ===================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/