Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755940AbaA2HRi (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 02:17:38 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:58543 "EHLO mail-ee0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750908AbaA2HRh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 02:17:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:17:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Vince Weaver Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: another perf_fuzzer soft lockup Message-ID: <20140129071731.GA30643@gmail.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Vince Weaver wrote: > After some idle time I've started running the perf_fuzzer again. > > It quickly found this lockup on a core2 system running 3.13 (yes, I > should probably be running 3.14-git but I'd rather wait for rc1 > first). JFYI, if -git looks too dangerous to you (and I cannot blame you for that view in the middle of a merge window) then tip:master is usually a pretty safe substitute for testing, it's the v3.14 perf code on a v3.13 base. > It looks like it's stuck in a lock in generic_exec_single() while > calling perf_event_task_output()? > > I'll try to see if I can come up with a test case. Thanks, those testcases are always very useful! Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/