Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 12:40:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 12:39:53 -0500 Received: from dnvrdslgw14poolB96.dnvr.uswest.net ([63.228.85.96]:28788 "EHLO q.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 12:39:40 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:39:38 -0700 (MST) From: Benson Chow To: cc: Subject: Re: ACPI broken in 2.4.1 In-Reply-To: <3A7D748C.6080701@magenta-logic.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I waited out the boot so I could login and experiment, but it was painfully slow. Compiling with just APM in and no ACPI, results in a correctly-running machine with rh7 gcc-2.96-69. I got lucky this time that with APM worked, else I'd be stuck with slowly fscking, since this last boot I had to fsck two of my partitions (maximum mount count exceeded...) I don't even want to know how long it'd take to fsck my almost 60GB worth of disks on this machine... If that were the case, I guess I'd be better off fscking with 2.4.0 and then coming back in... ouch. -bc On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Tony Hoyle wrote: > Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 15:26:04 +0000 > From: Tony Hoyle > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: ACPI broken in 2.4.1 > > In my wifes' machine 2.4.1 (both vanilla and -ac2) enabling ACPI causes > the machine to run so slowly it's unusable. On my machine it's OK. > 2.4.0 worked fine, so something has changed between 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 that > broke it. I couldn't find anything in dmesg that looked any different, > though. However since that machine has never successfully booted with > ACPI on the kern.log hasn't been written so it's unlikely I'd find anything. > > Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/