Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:09:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:09:46 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:46517 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:09:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:16:08 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Patrick Finnegan cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's left over. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1022 Lines: 25 On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Patrick Finnegan wrote: > No, vendor == people who sold or gave us the softare. Right now, Linus is > acting like he's a big evil corporation that won't add the change no > matter what we say: ... to his tree. Geez, why could that be? Maybe because you don't have any rights to decide what patches does anybody else apply to their trees? It's not a fscking public service. Linus has full control over his tree. You have equally full control over your tree. Linus can't tell you what patches to apply in your tree. You can't tell Linus what patches he should apply to his. "I'm not satisfied with this tree, I'll try that one" is perfectly OK. "I'm not satisfied with either, so bend the fsck over and change your tree the way I want" is _NOT_. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/