Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:56:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:56:21 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com ([204.127.198.38]:52638 "EHLO rwcrmhc51.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:56:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3DC2C587.5080706@kegel.com> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 10:18:47 -0800 From: Dan Kegel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Davide Libenzi CC: "Matthew D. Hall" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-aio@kvack.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 664 Lines: 18 Davide Libenzi wrote: >>* I'm sure everyone would agree that passing an opaque "user context" >>pointer is necessary with each event. > > I asked this about a week ago. It's _trivial_ to do in epoll. I did not > receive any feedback, so I didn't implement it. Feedback will be very much > appreciated here ... If it's cheap, do it! It relieves the programmer of having to manage a fd to object lookup table. - Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/