Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752944AbaA3ODj (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:03:39 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46012 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751816AbaA3ODi (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:03:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:03:32 +0100 From: Petr Tesarik To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] /dev/mem: handle out-of-bounds read/write Message-ID: <20140130150332.64419aee@hananiah.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20140130132827.GA22557@kroah.com> References: <20140130094802.4ee29435@hananiah.suse.cz> <20140130132827.GA22557@kroah.com> Organization: SUSE Linux, s.r.o. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 05:28:27 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote: > > The loff_t type may be wider than phys_addr_t (e.g. on 32-bit systems). > > Consequently, the file offset may be truncated in the assignment. > > Currently, /dev/mem wraps around, which may cause applications to read > > or write incorrect regions of memory by accident. > > Does that really happen? If so, that's a userspace bug, right? In my case, it was a userspace bug, indeed. But debugging would have been much easier if I saw read() fail with an EOF condition, rather than pretend that it actually read some bytes (from above 4G) on a 32-bit box. > > Let's follow POSIX file semantics here and return 0 when reading from > > and -EFBIG when writing to an offset that cannot be represented by a > > phys_addr_t. > > > > Note that the conditional is optimized out by the compiler if loff_t > > has the same size as phys_addr_t. > > > > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik > > --- > > drivers/char/mem.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > What is going to break if we apply this patch? :) Nothing, unless it was broken already. I mean, if anyone is trying to play dirty tricks with 32-bit file offset overflow, I'd call such code sick and broken. And on 64-bit platforms, the patch does not even change the generated code. Petr T -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/