Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753505AbaA3PwI (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:52:08 -0500 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:56241 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752733AbaA3PwF (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:52:05 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:52:04 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Daniel Vetter cc: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= , intel-gfx , Kernel development list Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Excessive WARN()s in Intel 915 driver In-Reply-To: <20140130152258.GS17001@phenom.ffwll.local> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Ok, I seem to have been truly blind all the time. This seems to have been > fallout from > > commit b6c5164d7bf624f3e1b750787ddb983150c5117c > Author: Daniel Vetter > Date: Fri Apr 12 18:48:43 2013 +0200 > > drm/i915: Fixup Oops in the pipe config computation > > Meanwhile we've moved the overall infrastructure ahead again quite a bit, > so I think it's time to give the full atomic modeset paths another shot. > But I'll be travelling to fosdem the next few days, so this will take a > bit of time. > > As long as there's not real bad side-effects I guess we simply need to > live with the WARN for a tad longer. Okay. Let me know when you've got something else ready to test. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/