Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753988AbaA3WrJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:47:09 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51]:63976 "EHLO mail-pb0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753522AbaA3WrH (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:47:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:47:05 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Eric Dumazet cc: Christoph Lameter , Eric Dumazet , Nishanth Aravamudan , LKML , Anton Blanchard , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Oleg Nesterov , Jan Kara , Thomas Gleixner , Tetsuo Handa , linux-mm@kvack.org, Wanpeng Li , Joonsoo Kim , Ben Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: ensure locality of task_struct allocations In-Reply-To: <1391062491.28432.68.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Message-ID: References: <20140128183808.GB9315@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1391062491.28432.68.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Eric, did you try this when writing 207205a2ba26 ("kthread: NUMA aware > > kthread_create_on_node()") or was it always numa_node_id() from the > > beginning? > > Hmm, I think I did not try this, its absolutely possible NUMA_NO_NODE > was better here. > Nishanth, could you change your patch to just return NUMA_NO_NODE for the non-kthreadd case? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/