Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:00:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:00:12 -0500 Received: from mpls-qmqp-01.inet.qwest.net ([63.231.195.112]:54026 "HELO mpls-qmqp-01.inet.qwest.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:00:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:06:24 -0800 Message-Id: <02110112062400.01200@rigel> From: "Steven King" To: "Linus Torvalds" , "Joel Becker" Cc: "Alan Cox" , "Bill Davidsen" , "Chris Friesen" , "Matt D. Robinson" , "Rusty Russell" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , lkcd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, lkcd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: What's left over. X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 932 Lines: 17 On Friday 01 November 2002 11:18 am, Linus Torvalds wrote: > To add insult to injury, you will not be able to actually _test_ any of > the real error paths in real life. Sure, you will be able to test forced > dumps on _your_ hardware, but while that is fine in the AIX model ("we > control the hardware, and charge the user five times what it is worth"), > again that doesn't mean _squat_ in the PC hardware space. On the other hand, ISC's system 5 r3 ran on commodity x86 hardware and the crash dumper worked on the various disk hardware I had occasion to use it on (mfm, scsi, ide), although one did need to make sure swap was larger than ram or bad things would happen. 8-{. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/