Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932436AbaAaMmM (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:42:12 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.219.45]:46874 "EHLO mail-oa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932145AbaAaMmL (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:42:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1390878162-22402-1-git-send-email-sonic.adi@gmail.com> References: <1390878162-22402-1-git-send-email-sonic.adi@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:42:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] pinctrl-adi2: change irq_base from usigned int to int From: Linus Walleij To: Sonic Zhang Cc: Steven Miao , LKML , adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Sonic Zhang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Sonic Zhang wrote: > From: Sonic Zhang > > Negative irq_base means there is no fixed Linux irq mappings are created from the platform data. > The driver calls irq_create_mapping to allocate a virtual Linux irq. Those IRQs are not any more "virtual" than any other Linux IRQ so I don't like this way of putting things. They are dynamically allocated though. The whole "virq" thing is just one big confusion, somehow people are under the impression that some IRQ numbers in the kernel are more "real" than others just because they happen to map 1-to-1 to a certain HW IRQ on the primary IRQ controller, but this is just pure luck. This is one reason we're trying to get rid of IRQ numbers altogether (if that will ever go anywhere). > Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang > --- > v2-changes: > - reword the patch description I applied v1 anyway. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/