Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932741AbaAaRFG (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:05:06 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]:58830 "EHLO mail-ie0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932453AbaAaRFE (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:05:04 -0500 Message-ID: <52EBD7BC.5020704@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:05:00 -0500 From: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Network Nut , "'Clemens Ladisch'" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel References: <00d901cf1a19$0ea62db0$2bf28910$@gmail.com> <52E554EC.3090900@ladisch.de> <012d01cf1ae3$6543e340$2fcba9c0$@gmail.com> <52E6219A.3020405@ladisch.de> <00d001cf1b99$026407d0$072c1770$@gmail.com> <52E77282.4030303@ladisch.de> <009701cf1c6c$fbfaff50$f3f0fdf0$@gmail.com> <95b6e508-1358-4f01-9687-344e25bd4b2b@email.android.com> <00f201cf1e15$f134ce70$d39e6b50$@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <00f201cf1e15$f134ce70$d39e6b50$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/30/2014 06:49 PM, Network Nut wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Clemens Ladisch [mailto:clemens@ladisch.de] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:31 AM >> To: Network Nut >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: RE: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel >> >> Network Nut wrote: >>> I was looking at POSIX because it allows naming of the primitives. >> >> Linux uses two orthogonal mechanisms for synchronization primitives and for >> naming/sharing. >> >>> I need to epoll_wait on inter-process {mutex, event, semaphore}. >> >> Use eventfd. >> >>> I need to reference inter-process {mutex, event, semaphore}, each >>> identified by string, if feasible. >> >> Send the fd through a Unix domain socket. > > Hi Again, > > I was thinking that, rather than as for specifics, I should present my general problem, and ask how long-time Linux experts would solve it. > > I have a master process M, that executes continually, from the birth to death of user-session. > > I have many (distinct) processes that will be launched, and these processes, P1, P2, ...Pn, expect to see that M is executing. These processes: > > 1. expect to have access to a shared-memory section that already exists because M created it > 2. expect to use a semaphore that already exists because M created it > 3. expect to use a mutex that exists because M created it > > P1, P2, ...Pn all know the path of image on disk of M. They are also permitted to maintain a fixed string that can be used to "get at" the mutex and semaphore. > > How would P1, P2, ...Pn get at the semaphore that M created? > > Please note that M cannot have any prior knowledge at all of P1, P2, ...Pn. P1...etc. must initiate communication with M. > > [I don't want to misuse/abuse linux-kernel with my personal questions, so if there is a more appropriate group, please let me know.] > > Regards, > > -Net Assuming that you're porting to mainline distributions (and not embedded devices), named SHM segments are accessible (providing the accessing process has correct permissions) under /dev/shm. You just need to make sure that you create the segment with the right permissions for the other processes to access it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/