Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932774AbaAaRJI (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:09:08 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.219.45]:52257 "EHLO mail-oa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932492AbaAaRJG (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:09:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: for.poige+linux@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <52EBD613.3040902@gmail.com> References: <52EBD613.3040902@gmail.com> From: Igor Podlesny Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 01:08:35 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: aSPa8UGC6aNVkfKaPpDUVq8e5rA Message-ID: Subject: Re: That greedy Linux VM cache To: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [...] On 1 February 2014 00:57, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > If I remember correctly, there is a sysctl for configuring how > aggressively the system tries to retain the VFS cache, changing the > value there might improve things for you. Yeah, in theory. On practice I never saw a difference even with vm.vfs_cache_pressure set to 800000. -- End of message. Next message? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/