Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932820AbaAaWEA (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:04:00 -0500 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:40493 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932325AbaAaWD6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:03:58 -0500 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , arm@kernel.org, Rob Herring , Philipp Zabel , Mark Rutland Cc: Grant Likely , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:03:03 +0100 Message-ID: <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.3 (Linux/3.11-2-amd64; KDE/4.11.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4970034.fqvMoHdOyd@phil> References: <4970034.fqvMoHdOyd@phil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko St?bner wrote: > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip > Cortex-A9 SoCs. So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the more general patches could use an ack. Going forward, what would be best way to merge them? As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the first three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stuff going through arm-soc? Or something else altogether? > Heiko Stuebner (7): > of: add functions to count number of elements in a property One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland . Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wished from Rob? And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the original thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) . > dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory > misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the pool parts) you asked for. Could I persuade you to take a look again? Thanks Heiko > ARM: rockchip: add snoop-control-unit > ARM: rockchip: add sram dt nodes and documentation > ARM: rockchip: add power-management-unit > ARM: rockchip: add smp bringup code > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/pmu.txt | 16 ++ > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/smp-sram.txt | 23 +++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt | 8 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3066a.dtsi | 6 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188.dtsi | 6 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3xxx.dtsi | 10 + > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h | 22 +++ > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S | 30 +++ > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 208 > ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rockchip.c | > 2 + > drivers/misc/sram.c | 121 +++++++++++- > drivers/of/base.c | 32 +++ > include/linux/of.h | 76 +++++++ > 15 files changed, 554 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/pmu.txt > create mode 100644 > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/smp-sram.txt create mode > 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/