Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751387AbaBBBvL (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:51:11 -0500 Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:41086 "EHLO mail-ve0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750977AbaBBBvI (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:51:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <52ED9EA9.7080009@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 17:51:07 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QBKWUDUZMyXX_04bIwWgEFe_yGc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make math_state_restore() save and restore the interrupt flag From: Linus Torvalds To: Suresh Siddha Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Nate Eldredge , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , stable , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maarten Baert , Jan Kara , George Spelvin , Pekka Riikonen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote: > > So if the restore failed, we should do something like drop_init_fpu(), > which will restore init-state to the registers. > > for eager-fpu() paths we don't use clts() stts() etc. Uhhuh. Ok. Why do we do that, btw? I think it would make much more sense to just do what I *thought* we did, and just make it a context-switch-time optimization ("let's always switch FP state"), not make it a huge semantic difference. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/