Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:01:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:01:06 -0500 Received: from ip68-105-128-224.tc.ph.cox.net ([68.105.128.224]:17069 "EHLO Bill-The-Cat.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:01:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 17:07:30 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Roman Zippel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Where's the documentation for Kconfig? Message-ID: <20021102000730.GB6410@opus.bloom.county> References: <20021101125226.B16919@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20021101193112.B26989@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20021101203033.GA5773@opus.bloom.county> <20021101203546.C26989@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20021101204225.GA6003@opus.bloom.county> <20021101204643.D26989@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20021101233250.GA6410@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 30 On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 12:52:05AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Tom Rini wrote: > > > I want both of these statements to be legal: > > > > config HEXVAL_B > > hex > > depends on BAZ > > default "0x12345678UL" > > Why? Consistency with values? It's not needed, but in somplaces we had: #define FOO 0x12345678UL, which was replaced with #define FOO CONFIG_BAR_VALUE So for consistency (and only that really, so if it's hard just say No) I'd like to be able to put back the 'UL' / 'L' -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/