Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752691AbaBCQEV (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:04:21 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175]:61563 "EHLO mail-ie0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751686AbaBCQEU (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:04:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1391316630-29541-3-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> References: <1391316630-29541-1-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> <1391316630-29541-3-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:04:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] HID: i2c-hid: implement ll_driver transport-layer callbacks From: David Herrmann To: Benjamin Tissoires Cc: Benjamin Tissoires , Jiri Kosina , Frank Praznik , "open list:HID CORE LAYER" , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > Add output_report and raw_request to i2c-hid. > Hopefully, we will manage to have the same transport level between > all the transport drivers. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires > --- > drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c > index ce68a12..5099f1f 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c > @@ -574,6 +574,28 @@ static int i2c_hid_output_raw_report(struct hid_device *hid, __u8 *buf, > return ret; > } > > +static int i2c_hid_output_report(struct hid_device *hid, __u8 *buf, > + size_t count) > +{ > + return i2c_hid_output_raw_report(hid, buf, count, HID_OUTPUT_REPORT); > +} > + > +static int i2c_hid_raw_request(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned char reportnum, > + __u8 *buf, size_t len, unsigned char rtype, > + int reqtype) > +{ > + switch (reqtype) { > + case HID_REQ_GET_REPORT: > + return i2c_hid_get_raw_report(hid, reportnum, buf, len, rtype); > + case HID_REQ_SET_REPORT: > + if (buf[0] != reportnum) > + return -EINVAL; > + return i2c_hid_output_raw_report(hid, buf, len, rtype); I just skimmed the I2C-HID specs and it defines three methods for input/output reports: 1) Section 6.2: raw async output-reports can be sent by writing the data at any time to wOutputRegister. This should be used as method for hid->output_report(). 2) Section 7.1: SET_REPORT can be issued by writing the right OPCODE + report-ID into wCommandRegister and the data into wDataRegister. This should be used as method for hid->raw_request() + HID_REQ_SET_REPORT. 3) Section 7.1: GET_REPORT can be issued by writing the right OPCODE + report-ID into wCommandRegister and then waiting for the device to write the data into wDataRegister. This should be used for hid->raw_request() + HID_REQ_GET_REPORT The GET_REPORT implementation looks fine to me, but the i2c_hid_set_report() seems to support both 1) and 2) depending on the passed type and capabilities: - it uses 2) for FEATURE_REPORT reports or if the max OUTPUT_LENGTH is 0 - it uses 1) otherwise I'm not sure whether the i2c-hid-spec mandates this behavior, so I am not saying it's wrong. I just wanna understand what we do here. So if we use hid->output_report() with HID_FEATURE_REPORT, the current code turns this into a SET_REPORT. Likewise, an hid->raw_request() with HID_REQ_SET_REPORT but with HID_OUTPUT_REPORT turns into an output-report. I'd rather expect this behavior: hid->output_report() should always do this: args[index++] = outputRegister & 0xFF; args[index++] = outputRegister >> 8; hidcmd = &hid_no_cmd; while hid->raw_request() should always do this: args[index++] = dataRegister & 0xFF; args[index++] = dataRegister >> 8; The special case for maxOutputLength==0 seems fine to me, but the "reportType == 0x03" looks weird. Thanks David > + default: > + return -EIO; > + } > +} > + > static void i2c_hid_request(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *rep, > int reqtype) > { > @@ -761,6 +783,8 @@ static struct hid_ll_driver i2c_hid_ll_driver = { > .close = i2c_hid_close, > .power = i2c_hid_power, > .request = i2c_hid_request, > + .output_report = i2c_hid_output_report, > + .raw_request = i2c_hid_raw_request, > }; > > static int i2c_hid_init_irq(struct i2c_client *client) > -- > 1.8.3.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/