Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 07:16:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 07:16:44 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:16398 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 07:16:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:23:12 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Denis Vlasenko Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2/2 2.5.45 cleanup & add original copy_ro/from_user Message-ID: <20021102132312.A563@wotan.suse.de> References: <20021102025838.220E.AT541@columbia.edu.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <200211021203.gA2C37p24480@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <20021102130954.A30729@wotan.suse.de> <200211021216.gA2CGEp24534@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211021216.gA2CGEp24534@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 592 Lines: 14 > It's easy to time memcpy() but harder to measure susequent > cache misses when copied data gets accessed. We can read it > back after memcpy and measure memcpy()+read, but is entire > copy gets used immediately after memcpy() in real world usage? > We're in benchmarking hell :( You test common operations, like pipe bandwidth or ioctls. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/